<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Oregon Divorce Blog &#187; Collaborative Divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/tag/collaborative-divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Divorce and Family Law information from Stephens Margolin P.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Margolin on Collaborative Divorce Practice</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/12/daniel-margolin-on-collaborative-divorce-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/12/daniel-margolin-on-collaborative-divorce-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/12/daniel-margolin-on-collaborative-divorce-practice/' addthis:title='Daniel Margolin on Collaborative Divorce Practice'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Daniel Margolin, a partner at Stephens Margolin P.C. recently wrote an article for the Oregon State Bar newsletter titled &#8220;Collaborative Practice: An Overview.&#8221; A link to the publication can be found here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Daniel <span>Margolin</span>, a partner at Stephens <span>Margolin</span> P.C. recently wrote an article for the Oregon State Bar newsletter titled &#8220;Collaborative Practice: An Overview.&#8221; </span><a href="http://osbfamilylaw.homestead.com/files/Newsletters/2009/FamilyLaw_2009Dec.pdf">A link to the publication can be found here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/12/daniel-margolin-on-collaborative-divorce-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News: Survey by Institute For Divorce Financial Analysts shows economy impacting divorce decisions</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/news-survey-by-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-economy-impacting-divorce-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/news-survey-by-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-economy-impacting-divorce-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Oregon Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/news-survey-by-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-economy-impacting-divorce-decisions/' addthis:title='News: Survey by Institute For Divorce Financial Analysts shows economy impacting divorce decisions'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>The Institute for Divorce Financial Analysts published the results of an interesting survey on June 11, 2009. In a collaborative case or a traditional case, a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst™ (CDFA™) can forecast the long-term effects of the proposed divorce &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/news-survey-by-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-economy-impacting-divorce-decisions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Institute for Divorce Financial Analysts published the results of an interesting survey on June 11, 2009.  In a collaborative case or a traditional case, a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst™ (CDFA™) can forecast the long-term effects of the proposed divorce settlement. A CDFA can also help attorneys by helping the client make financial sense of proposals, and empower their clients with the knowledge they need to make smart financial choices. An April 2009 survey of CDFA&#8217;s indicated that the ways in which divorce proceedings are handled has changed substantially with the dip in the stock market and home prices. The survey found some clients in an indefinite holding pattern while waiting for the economy to recover. Clients were also considering non-traditional,  creative solutions to property division problems, such as sharing the marital home post divorce until the home sells or the market improves. <a href="http://www.pitchengine.com/institutefordivorcefinancialanalysts/recent-survey-conducted-by-the-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-increase-in-number-of-people-unable-to-afford-divorce/15065/">A link to the article published by the IFDC is here.</a></p>
<p>As a Portland Oregon based divorce law firm, the attorneys at Stephens Margolin P.C.  have seen the impact of the housing crisis and the declining stock market on clients. In recent litigation, we have seen courts ordering one spouse to pay the other to keep a house that is underwater.  Parties contemplating divorce are well served to consult with lawyers trained in both traditional litigation and collaborative divorce to ensure that all resolution options are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/news-survey-by-institute-for-divorce-financial-analysts-shows-economy-impacting-divorce-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Collaborative Divorce</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/02/book-review-collaborative-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/02/book-review-collaborative-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C. Sean Stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooperative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Margolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Oregon Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Stephens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/02/book-review-collaborative-divorce/' addthis:title='Book Review: Collaborative Divorce'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>[openbook booknumber="0060889438"]Pauline Tesler is one of the founders of the collaborative divorce movement in the United States.  My business partner and I attended a collaborative divorce training presented by Pauline Tesler (and organized by Donna Smalldon, CDFA, CFP, MBA, CFDP) &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/02/book-review-collaborative-divorce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>[openbook booknumber="0060889438"]Pauline Tesler is one of the founders of the collaborative divorce movement in the United States.  My business partner and I attended a collaborative divorce training presented by Pauline Tesler (and organized by Donna Smalldon, CDFA, CFP, MBA, CFDP) and were inspired by the message of what is possible in the collaborative divorce model vs. the traditional litigation model.  We both read Pauline Tesler&#8217;s book &#8220;Collaborative Divorce&#8221; and found it so informative we bought in bulk to hand out to collaborative divorce clients.  An insightful and informative look at collaborative divorce from the client&#8217;s perspective.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/02/book-review-collaborative-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dispute Resolution: Family Law Mediation in Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas County</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C. Sean Stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooperative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Margolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephens Margolin P.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/' addthis:title='Dispute Resolution: Family Law Mediation in Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas County'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>As a divorce lawyer in downtown Portland Oregon, I frequently get asked about the mediation requirements for family law cases in Multnomah, Clackamas, and Washington county.  Some people are aware of the availability of mediation through the county, and some &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a divorce lawyer in downtown Portland Oregon, I frequently get asked about the mediation requirements for family law cases in Multnomah, Clackamas, and Washington county.  Some people are aware of the availability of mediation through the county, and some are not.  There is confusion about what mediation is, and how it differs from a hearing or a trial. We hear lots of questions like &#8220;what is mediation? Is county mediation mandatory? Do I have to mediate if I know the other parent won&#8217;t agree?  Will I have to see the other parent face to face?  The following is our effort to summarize the court’s authority to require mediation,  the reasons behind court mandated mediation, and provide information about county family law mediation in the tri-county area.</p>
<p>Mediation is a form of dispute resolution that aims to assist two or more disputants in reaching an agreement. At a trial, the parties present evidence, and a decision is imposed on the parties by the judge. In mediation, the parties themselves determine if there is an agreement, and the contents of the agreement. Many parents chose mediation with a private mediator. If, for financial or other reasons, you do not want to hire a private mediator, Multnomah, Clakamas, and Washington county make mediation available to parties involved in family law disputes.  Courts want people to mediate because it weeds out cases that can be resolved without the help of a judge. Clients want mediation because it gives them control over the outcome, is confidential, reduces conflict between the parties, and is generally less expensive than litigation.  Good lawyers like mediation because it provides an efficient and lower cost way to help clients resolve their disputes.          </p>
<p>ORS 107.755 requires that each judicial district provide a mediation orientation session for all parties in cases where custody, parenting time, or visitation is in dispute, and in any other domestic relations case where mediation has been ordered. The orientation session should make parties aware of (1) what mediation is; (2) mediation options available to them; and (3) the advantages and disadvantages of each method of dispute resolution. With limited exceptions, mediation is mandatory prior to a judge hearing  a case.  Mediation is not appropriate for restraining order or cases involving domestic violence, and court mediators must, per statute, be trained in recognizing domestic violence, allow parties to opt out, and take steps to avoid intimidation before and during mediation. County mediation is held in private, and all persons other than the mediator and staff, parties, counsel and children of the parties shall be excluded.  All communications, verbal or written, made in mediation proceedings shall be confidential, and not subject to examination in court.</p>
<p><strong>Multnomah County</strong>:  The court&#8217;s rules about mediation are located in SLR 8.046.  Multnomah county is a mandatory mediation county for family law cases.  If you don &#8216;t mediate or get permission to get out of mediation, you won&#8217;t get time with a judge. No temporary hearing or trial regarding custody or parenting time will be set unless an Order for mediation has been obtained, an Order Waiving Mediation has been entered, or the parties have attended mediation since the filing of the Petition.  Modification motions will not be heard without compliance with the mediation requirement. The <a href="http://www.co.multnomah.or.us/dcj/fcourt.shtml">Multnomah County Family Court Services website</a> provides that mediation is available for custody and visitation issues.  The service is supported by filing fees and is free to the participants. For more information or to set an appointment call Family Court Services at 503.988.3189.</p>
<p><strong>Washington County</strong>: Washington County has mandatory mediation for Any action filed in the court involving a controversy over custody or parenting time of minor children. If the parties agree, the mediator can address issues other than children, such as property and support.  If there is a disagreement concerning custody or parenting time at any stage of a domestic relations proceeding, the parties must mediate.  Parties must complete two sessions of Kids Turn, the mandatory parenting class prior to mediating. Parties may independently select a private mediator. Mediation is confidential, and free. The <a href="http://www.co.washington.or.us/deptmts/juvenile/divorce.htm#whatismed">Washington County Conciliation Services </a>website provides information on mediation services in Washington County. Mediation can be scheduled by court order, or by calling Conciliation Services at : (503) 846-3428.</p>
<p><strong>Clackamas Count</strong>y: Clackamas county is a voluntary mediation county.  There is no SLR mandating mediation. Parents can access free mediation through the county, but are not required to do so in most cases unless specifically ordered to by a judge.  The <a href="http://www.clackamas.us/fcs/domestic.htm#5">Clackamas County Family Court Services </a>website provides information about accessing mediation in Clackamas County.  Most types of family law filings qualify for one or two free mediation sessions. Mediation sessions beyond the two free sessions are charged at $80 per hour. Mediation can be scheduled by calling  Family Court Services at  503-655-8415 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Collaborative Divorce</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/thoughts-on-collaborative-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/thoughts-on-collaborative-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Portland Oregon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/thoughts-on-collaborative-divorce/' addthis:title='Thoughts on Collaborative Divorce'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Having a trial is a way, but not the only way to resolve your case. There are many tools available for resolving your case other than a trial. Good family law lawyers are problem solvers, and the good ones recommend &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/thoughts-on-collaborative-divorce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Having a trial is a way, but not the only way to resolve your case. There are many tools available for resolving your case other than a trial. Good family law lawyers are problem solvers, and the good ones recommend that their clients try to resolve their disputes outside the courtroom. Many jurisdictions have mandatory mediation (without lawyers) for parenting time and custody issues. Many good lawyers recommend their clients use private (for a fee) attorney guided mediation for property and custody and parenting time issues. Many participate in judicial settlement conferences where a judge attempts to guide the parties towards a cooperative resolution. If successful, the benefit of these tools to the client is usually lower cost, less conflict, and an agreement they chose, rather than having a judge <em>tell</em> them what the result is.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">Some specially trained lawyers are using a new process called “Collaborative Divorce” designed to keep clients out of the courthouse from the beginning. Collaborative Divorce is a non-litigious party based settlement process in which a husband and wife or domestic partners work together to dissolve their relationship.<span> </span>The process can result in less cost, stress and judicial involvement than a litigated divorce or domestic partnership dissolution.<span> The main idea is for the parties to work together to end their relationship in a manner which allows for each party to be self-sustaining financially and that serves the best interest of their child.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">In a Collaborative Divorce case, the parties use a team of professionals to work on specific areas of their case.<span> </span>For example, if a child is involved, then the parties would have a child specialist on their team.<span> </span>In all cases, a financial specialist trained specifically in divorce finance and a mental health practitioner will be used. One benefit of the collaborative divorce process is that it can produce much more creative methods of property division and spousal/child support than a judge in a litigated case would order. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">At the beginning of the case, the parties sign a collaborative practice agreement or participation agreement, which outlines the essential principles of the collaborative process.<span> </span>The agreement limits the parties’ attorney-client confidentiality and sets forth the rule that if the collaborative process is unsuccessful, then all of the professionals involved in the case, including both parties’ lawyers, will no longer work on the case.<span> </span>In addition, any materials or information produced in the process will not be admissible in court.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">This process is very popular in Canada, Australia, and in some states in the US.<span> </span>It has not taken off yet in Oregon at a substantial level.<span> </span>There are, however, a number of collaboratively trained lawyers and team professionals in the Portland area. This is a growing field, and something to seriously consider if both you and your spouse wish to avoid the expense, stress, and frustration of traditional, adversarial litigation. Our office maintains a list of family law lawyers trained in the collaborative process.<span> </span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/thoughts-on-collaborative-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaborative Divorce &#8211; Choosing the right lawyer</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/collaborative-divorce-choosing-the-right-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/collaborative-divorce-choosing-the-right-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Portland Oregon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/collaborative-divorce-choosing-the-right-lawyer/' addthis:title='Collaborative Divorce &#8211; Choosing the right lawyer'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>In initial consultations with clients I make sure to go over the different models of resolving a family law case.  These include:  collaborative divorce; mediation; traditional litigation; and a mix of these models.  It is crucial that clients understand the &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/collaborative-divorce-choosing-the-right-lawyer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In initial consultations with clients I make sure to go over the different models of resolving a family law case.  These include:  collaborative divorce; mediation; traditional litigation; and a mix of these models.  It is crucial that clients understand the pros and cons of each model and that lawyers understand which model is right for the case and client. </p>
<p>At the 2008 family law conference, a presenter, Forrest Monsten, a well respected mediator from California, said that he believes that it is malpractice for a lawyer to not address all of the avaiable ways to resolve a family law dispute with a client. </p>
<p>If you would like more information on these different models, please contact Daniel Margolin or C. Sean Stepehns at Stephens Margolin PC so that they can address with you which model best fits your needs and wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/10/collaborative-divorce-choosing-the-right-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which divorce model is best for me?</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/05/which-divorce-model-is-best-for-me/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/05/which-divorce-model-is-best-for-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce Oregon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/05/which-divorce-model-is-best-for-me/' addthis:title='Which divorce model is best for me?'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Clients have a few options regarding a procedure model for their divorce case.  They can go the standard litigation route through the courts, engage in mediation, or use the collaborative divorce model.  There are costs and benefits to proceeding under &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/05/which-divorce-model-is-best-for-me/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clients have a few options regarding a procedure model for their divorce case.  They can go the standard litigation route through the courts, engage in mediation, or use the collaborative divorce model. </p>
<p>There are costs and benefits to proceeding under any model.  In a perfect world, the collaborative model would be the most cost-effective and most effective at resolving disputes in a manner that benefits all parties.  If your case involves physical or extreme emotional abuse, drug or alcohol abuse by one parent so severe that parent cannot understand the harm it has caused to kids or that parent is not able or willing to put up with supervision and requirements, if one party is unable to financially move forward and the other party will not cooperate, or if it is impossible for the parties to trust each other, then a traditional litigation model will be necessary to resolve your dispute.  </p>
<p>A good attorney who is trained and experienced in both models can assist you, not only in choosing the best model for you, but also, in making sure that you do not make the wrong choice.  The collaborative model can also be used to assist parties in domestic partnership dissolutions and custody disputes as well as in a divorce.</p>
<p>The lawyers at Stephens Margolin P.C. are happy to discuss the various legal models with you.  Contact us for a consultation if you would like to discuss these models with regard to your specific situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/05/which-divorce-model-is-best-for-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaborative Divorce</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/01/collaborative-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/01/collaborative-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spousal Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooperative Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Oregon Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Oregon Divorce Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/01/collaborative-divorce/' addthis:title='Collaborative Divorce'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Having a trial is a way, but not the only way to resolve your case. There are many tools available for resolving your case other than a trial. Good family law lawyers are problem solvers, and the good ones recommend &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/01/collaborative-divorce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Having a trial is a way, but not the only way to resolve your case.  There are many tools available for resolving your case other than a trial.  Good family law lawyers are problem solvers, and the good ones recommend that their clients try to resolve their disputes outside the courtroom. Many jurisdictions have mandatory mediation (without lawyers) for parenting time and custody issues.  Many good lawyers recommend their clients use private (for a fee) attorney guided mediation for property and custody and parenting time issues.  Many participate in judicial settlement conferences where a judge attempts to guide the parties towards a cooperative resolution.  If successful, the benefit of these tools to the client is usually lower cost, less conflict, and an agreement they chose, rather than having a judge <em>tell</em> them what the result is.<br />
<span style="color: #444444;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">Some specially trained lawyers are using a new process called &#8220;Collaborative  Divorce&#8221; designed to keep clients out of the courthouse from the beginning. Collaborative Divorce is a non-litigious party based settlement process in which a husband and wife or domestic partners work together to dissolve their relationship.<span> </span>The process can result in less cost, stress and judicial involvement than a litigated divorce or domestic partnership dissolution.<span> The main idea is for the parties to work together to end their relationship in a manner which allows for each party to be self-sustaining financially and that serves the best interest of their child.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">In a Collaborative Divorce case, the parties use a team of professionals to work on specific areas of their case.<span> </span>For example, if a child is involved, then the parties would have a child specialist on their team.<span> </span>In all cases, a financial specialist trained specifically in divorce finance and a mental health practitioner will be used.  One benefit of the collaborative divorce process is that it can produce much more creative methods of property division and spousal/child support than a judge in a litigated case would order. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">At the beginning of the case, the parties sign a collaborative practice agreement or participation agreement, which outlines the essential principles of the collaborative process.<span> </span>The agreement limits the parties’ attorney-client confidentiality and sets forth the rule that if the collaborative process is unsuccessful, then all of the professionals involved in the case, including both parties’ lawyers, will no longer work on the case.<span> </span>In addition, any materials or information produced in the process will not be admissible in court.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: #444444;">This process is very popular in Canada, Australia, and in some states in the US.<span> </span>It has not taken off yet in Oregon at a substantial level.<span> </span>There are, however, a number of collaboratively trained lawyers and team professionals in the Portland area.  This is a growing field, and something to seriously consider if both you and your spouse wish to avoid the expense, stress, and frustration of traditional, adversarial litigation. Our office maintains a list of family law lawyers trained in the collaborative process.<span> </span></span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/01/collaborative-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

