<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Oregon Divorce Blog &#187; Divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/category/divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Divorce and Family Law information from Stephens Margolin P.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; “Just and Proper” Division of Separate Assets</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-separate-assets/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-separate-assets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meg Clark-Kilcoyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-separate-assets/' addthis:title='New Case Law &#8211; “Just and Proper” Division of Separate Assets'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>On March 14, 2012, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Wolfe and Wolfe. In this case, the wife appealed the trial court’s assignment of certain investment accounts to the husband as his separate property. The wife also appealed the duration &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-separate-assets/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 14, 2012, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided <em>Wolfe and Wolfe</em>. In this case, the wife appealed the trial court’s assignment of certain investment accounts to the husband as his separate property. The wife also appealed the duration and amount of spousal support awarded by the trial court, but the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s award after modifying the distribution of property.</p>
<p>The parties accumulated significant property and investments during the marriage. The husband also owned two investment accounts and an interest in a trust. The trial court awarded these assets to the husband as his separate property. The Court of Appeals, however, found that although the husband had rebutted the presumption of equal contribution as to those assets, the fact that he had used those assets to pay for family expenses, that he intended those assets to benefit the family long term, and that he and the wife had relied on those assets in their joint financial planning, made it just and proper to award the wife a portion of those assets. The court awarded the wife an additional $2 million of the husband’s $10 million in separate assets.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/sites/Publications/A139934.pdf">The entire opinion can be found here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-separate-assets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Attorney Fee Awards in Family Law Cases</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-attorney-fee-awards-in-family-law-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-attorney-fee-awards-in-family-law-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meg Clark-Kilcoyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-attorney-fee-awards-in-family-law-cases/' addthis:title='New Case Law &#8211; Attorney Fee Awards in Family Law Cases'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>On January 25, 2012, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Berry and Huffman. In this case, the former husband tried to modify his obligation to make payments under a stipulated judgment, and the former wife wished to enforce the terms &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-attorney-fee-awards-in-family-law-cases/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 25, 2012, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided <em>Berry and Huffman</em>. In this case, the former husband tried to modify his obligation to make payments under a stipulated judgment, and the former wife wished to enforce the terms of that judgment. The trial court awarded the wife her attorney fees incurred enforcing the judgment, justifying the award based on ORS 107.135(15) and ORS 107.135(8). The Court of Appeals stated that these statutes were not appropriate to support an award of attorney fees <em>in this case</em>. The court went on to state that ORS 107.135(8) may sometimes justify an award of attorney fees where the prevailing party was enforcing a judgment under 107.104 in the context of a modification under 107.135, “if the enforcement efforts are reasonably and materially related to the resolution of the modification dispute.” The court required a nexus between the enforcement issues and the modification issues which it did not find in this case. The court also found that ORS 107.105(1)(j), which allows attorney fees in judgments of dissolution, did not provide a basis for awarding attorney fees in an enforcement action.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/Publications/A142774.pdf">The entire opinion can be found here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-attorney-fee-awards-in-family-law-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; “Just and Proper” Division of Marital Assets</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-marital-assets/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-marital-assets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meg Clark-Kilcoyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Division]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-marital-assets/' addthis:title='New Case Law &#8211; “Just and Proper” Division of Marital Assets'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>On December 14, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Hanscam and Hanscam. In this case, the wife appealed the trial court’s division of property. The property in dispute included a rental property the husband purchased prior to the marriage, &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-marital-assets/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 14, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided <em>Hanscam and Hanscam</em>. In this case, the wife appealed the trial court’s division of property. The property in dispute included a rental property the husband purchased prior to the marriage, the husband’s accounting practice, the husband’s interest in a family partnership, and a Porsche. The trial court awarded the husband his premarital equity in the rental property, his premarital ownership interest in the accounting practice, his interest in the family business, and the full value of the Porsche as his separate property. The Court of Appeals, however, stated that although the husband’s premarital ownership in both the rental property and his accounting practice was one factor it must consider, it must also consider whether it was just and proper in all the circumstances to award that property to the husband as his separate asset. In this case, the wife’s contribution to and involvement in the management of the rental property entitled her to share equally in its value. Further, the wife’s contributions to the family which allowed the husband to grow his accounting practice, combined with her reliance on the practice as the family’s primary source of income, entitled her to share in the fully value of that asset. Finally, because the husband used marital funds to make improvements to the Porsche, the court found that the wife should share equally in its increase in value during the marriage. The court did not disturb the trial court’s treatment of the family business, which was the husband’s separately held property throughout the marriage.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/Publications/A142420.pdf"> The entire opinion can be found here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/new-case-law-%e2%80%9cjust-and-proper%e2%80%9d-division-of-marital-assets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce and Social Security in 10 + year marriages</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/divorce-and-social-security-in-10-year-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/divorce-and-social-security-in-10-year-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/divorce-and-social-security-in-10-year-marriages/' addthis:title='Divorce and Social Security in 10 + year marriages'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>In meeting with divorcing Oregonians, I get a lot of questions about social security benefits as part of divorce.  Many people don&#8217;t know, but if you have been married for at least ten years with your “soon to be ex&#8221; &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/divorce-and-social-security-in-10-year-marriages/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/iStock_000008528136XSmall.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1212" title="iStock_000008528136XSmall" src="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/iStock_000008528136XSmall-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In meeting with divorcing Oregonians, I get a lot of questions about social security benefits as part of divorce.  Many people don&#8217;t know, but if you have been married for at least ten years with your “soon to be ex&#8221; your spousee can recieve benfits based on your social security record (even if you have remarried) if:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li>You were married at least 10 years</li>
<li>Your ex is unmarried</li>
<li>Your ex is 62 or older</li>
<li>Your ex is entitled to receive less benefits from their own work history v.s yours.</li>
<li>You are entitled to benefits.</li>
</ol>
<p>Divorcing couples seeking a cooperative resolution who have been married 9, but not quite 10 years may wish to delay finalization so that the lower earning spouse can be entitled to the maximum benefits.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/divorce-and-social-security-in-10-year-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What To Do When Your Divorce Is This Weeks News</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-divorce-is-this-weeks-news/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-divorce-is-this-weeks-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-divorce-is-this-weeks-news/' addthis:title='What To Do When Your Divorce Is This Weeks News'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>I get questions from potential and current clients about how to deal with the public knowledge (be it local media, your children's school, your neighborhood or your friends) that you are going through a divorce.  <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-divorce-is-this-weeks-news/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  get  questions from potential and current clients about how to deal with the public knowledge (be it local media, your children&#8217;s school, your neighborhood or your friends) that you are going through a divorce.</p>
<p>The Huffington Post carried  a good article by Linda Lipshutz, MS, ACSW on high profile divorces, and how to best conduct your business if you are unfortunate enough to be involved in one. So what to do when your friends, neighbors, or the media are dissecting and embellishing every sordid detail? Linda&#8217;s article correctly points out that (1) Public attention is short lived, and your neighbors / friends / the media will find another story that catches their attention soon; (2) Connecting with others helps enormously; and (3) No one can make you feel inferior without your permission.</p>
<p>Linda&#8217;s advice is spot on, and should be considered by all divorcing Oregonians who find that their private matter is not so private after all.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-lipshutz/when-your-divorce-is-this_b_1286591.html">A link to the full Huffington Post article is here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/03/what-to-do-when-your-divorce-is-this-weeks-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Pensions in Payout Status are Treated as Personal Property</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-pensions-in-payout-status-are-treated-as-personal-property/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-pensions-in-payout-status-are-treated-as-personal-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Margolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-pensions-in-payout-status-are-treated-as-personal-property/' addthis:title='New Case Law &#8211; Pensions in Payout Status are Treated as Personal Property'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>On December 29, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Rushby and Rushby. In this case, the husband and wife were both former government employees and were both receiving monthly retirement benefit payments from PERS.  Generally retirement accounts are divided &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-pensions-in-payout-status-are-treated-as-personal-property/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 29, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided <em>Rushby and Rushby</em>.</p>
<p>In this case, the husband and wife were both former government employees and were both receiving monthly retirement benefit payments from PERS.  Generally retirement accounts are divided along with the rest of the personal property in a divorce case, and the court tries to make sure that the husband and wife each get an equal share of the property.  In this case, however, because both accounts were in payout status the Trial Court treated them as &#8220;income streams&#8221; for the purpose of calculating spousal support. The wife appealed the Trial Court’s decision, and the Court of Appeals decided that retirement accounts, even those in payout status, are property and should be divided as part of the property division, not treated as income.  As a result, the Court of Appeals ordered that the Trial Court should divide the retirement accounts between the parties and award the wife a portion of the husband’s account to equalize the property division.</p>
<p>The entire opinion can be found here.  <a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A144086.pdf"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0000ff;">http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A144086.pdf</span></span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-pensions-in-payout-status-are-treated-as-personal-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accidentally Omitted Liabilities in Divorce</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/accidentally-omitted-liabilities-in-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/accidentally-omitted-liabilities-in-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/accidentally-omitted-liabilities-in-divorce/' addthis:title='Accidentally Omitted Liabilities in Divorce'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>I prevously blogged about omitted assets, and what the court can do if an asset is  left out of property division.  What do you do if you have an omitted liability in your Oregon divorce vs. an omitted asset?  I advise everyone &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/accidentally-omitted-liabilities-in-divorce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000015842416XSmall.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1173" title="iStock_000015842416XSmall" src="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000015842416XSmall-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I prevously blogged about <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/06/divorce-remedies-for-omitted-or-hidden-assets/">omitted assets</a>, and what the court can do if an asset is  left out of property division.  What do you do if you have an omitted liability in your Oregon divorce vs. an omitted asset?  I advise everyone to pull a copy of their credit report to make sure they know what liabilities are showing up, but this system isn&#8217;t perfect.  With the condo and home  foreclosures in the Portland area, it is not uncommon for bills to be sent to a house which neither party occupies, and for both parties to miss them.  The language of the omitted asset statute, ORS 107.452 is clear that it only applies to liabilities, so what to do if you  if you discover an omitted liability after your divorce is final?</p>
<p>If you accidentally leave a debt out of your property division, and discover it later, the court can still help. Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure 71 B allows a party relief from a judgment for several reasons, including:</p>
<ol>
<li>mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;</li>
<li>newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial;</li>
<li>fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party.</li>
</ol>
<p>If a liability is accidentally omitted, or intentionally concealed by your spouse, the court has the power to re-open the Oregon divorce case and include it in the distribution. There is no substitute for due diligence during a divorce, including scrutinizing your credit report, and making sure all assets and liabilities are accounted for. However, if a liability is omitted, a lawyer can help make the liability distribution fair.</p>
<p>The lawyers at Stephens Margolin PC have substantial experience helping divorced Oregonians with post-judgment issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/accidentally-omitted-liabilities-in-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Case Law &#8211; Presumption of Equal Contribution</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-presumption-of-equal-contribution/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-presumption-of-equal-contribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meg Clark-Kilcoyne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-presumption-of-equal-contribution/' addthis:title='New Case Law &#8211; Presumption of Equal Contribution'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>On December 14, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Loomis and Loomis. In this case, the wife owned a 60% interest in a piece of property prior to the marriage, and acquired the other 40% interest during the marriage. &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-presumption-of-equal-contribution/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 14, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Loomis and Loomis.</p>
<p>In this case, the wife owned a 60% interest in a piece of property prior to the marriage, and acquired the other 40% interest during the marriage. The trial court awarded the entire property to the wife as a pre-marital asset and did not include it in the division of marital property in the divorce. The Court of Appeals found that the wife’s 60% interest acquired prior to the marriage was her separate property, and not a marital asset. It also stated that the prenuptial agreement signed by the parties overrode any interest the husband might have had in the appreciation on the wife’s 60% interest under ORS 107.105(1)(f) or the Kunze line of cases. However, the Court found that the 40% interest that the wife acquired during the marriage was a marital asset. The Court stated that this interest was subject to the ORS 107.105(1)(f) presumption of equal contribution, and that the wife did not rebut that presumption where the husband made some financial contribution to the purchase, he was making financial contributions to the couple’s joint finances, and the couple used the property for “joint marital endeavors.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A142038.pdf">The entire opinion can be found here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/02/new-case-law-presumption-of-equal-contribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Benefits Of Cooperating With Your Ex</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/tip-on-getting-along-with-an-ex-spouse/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/tip-on-getting-along-with-an-ex-spouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/tip-on-getting-along-with-an-ex-spouse/' addthis:title='The Benefits Of Cooperating With Your Ex'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>As a Portland Oregon divorce lawyer, I meet with many parents post divorce that have difficulty getting along with their ex-spouse.  One of the  most stressful events in life is divorce, and it makes sense that divorce would further damage &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/tip-on-getting-along-with-an-ex-spouse/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Portland Oregon divorce lawyer, I meet with many parents post divorce that have difficulty getting along with their ex-spouse.  One of the  most stressful events in life is divorce, and it makes sense that divorce would further damage  many parent&#8217;s ability to get along with the ex. Although the marital relationship ends, many ex-spouses would like to have an ongoing friendly relationship with their exes, especially where kids are involved. Not everyone can get along, and there are safety and metal health reasons that may make post divorce cooperation impossible.  From my perspective as a divorce lawyer, for divorced parents that could get along, cooperation and getting along has enormous benefits for your children. I believe that many divorced parents that end up using lawyers for modifications could have avoided the legal process in the first place by maintaining a good relationship with their ex.</p>
<p>Here are a few tips based on my 17 years of experience helping people during and after divorce:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Establish New Boundaries.</strong> Decide what things can and cannot be discussed. It is best for you to stay away from the topics of conflict until such time that you can calmly discuss them.</li>
<li><strong>Compromise.</strong> “Agree to disagree.” This one can be tough because of pride and differences in opinion. When this happens, you need to focus and get back to the reason why you need to get along… your children. You should also acknowledge from the beginning that there will be inevitably differences in opinion. Then agree that when this happens, you should try not to talk while angry.  There should be a reasonable cooling period, and the try again.</li>
<li><strong>Keep the promises. </strong>Once you and ex-spouse have compromised agreements, you need to keep those promises. If you agreed to take turns to pick up kids,  live up to that agreement.  Whether you followed through or not during the marriage, you need to now.</li>
<li><strong>Continue to communicate. </strong>Communication is vital. The cold shoulder or silent treatment may have contributed to the breakdown of the marriage, and it is even more destructive to cooperation post-divorce.  You and your ex-spouse need to keep the lines of communication open even if it is awkward.</li>
<li><strong>Consider Counseling.</strong> The Portland area has many extraordinary counselors who can help divorced couples with communication. I frequently refer people to counselors as part of our helping approach to divorce and because I believe that if successful,  it has enormous benefits for a client. If you or your ex are having difficulty with the above three points, consider getting into post divorce counseling to help with your communication issues.</li>
</ol>
<p>Divorce is an opportunity to establish a new relationship with your ex that focuses on the children.  From my experience, parents that can focus on getting along and on the kids use lawyers less and are happier. Most importantly, there are enormous benefits for your children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/tip-on-getting-along-with-an-ex-spouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Keep Or Change Last Name?</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/to-keep-or-change-last-name/</link>
		<comments>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/to-keep-or-change-last-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style " addthis:url='http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/to-keep-or-change-last-name/' addthis:title='To Keep Or Change Last Name?'  ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>Are you in the process of a divorce and thinking if you will keep or change your last name? It is a simple process to do as part of a divorce, and harder if you decide to do it after &#8230; <a href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/to-keep-or-change-last-name/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you in the process of a divorce and thinking if you will keep or change your last name? It is a simple process to do as part of a divorce, and harder if you decide to do it after the divorce is completed.</p>
<p>In Oregon at the time of divorce, the court can change the name of either spouse to a name the spouse held before the marriage.</p>
<p>Do you feel you need your former name for a fresh start? Do you have kids, and how will a name change affect the children at school and with their peers? Are you an established professional with goodwill attached to your current last name? There are a lot of considerations to go through in deciding what is the right choice for you.</p>
<p>If you decide to change your name, plan on spending substantial time working on it.</p>
<p>Here are some things that you need to do when you will change your last name:</p>
<ol>
<li>Get new identification cards, such as drivers license or state ID card, social security, etc.</li>
<li>Inform people, agencies and organizations, and and companies of the change of name. You should let your bank, schools, doctors, postal office, insurance companies, business associates, family members, retirement accounts, and friends know.  Be ready for supporting documents when updating information.</li>
<li>Once you have completed #2, get a credit report to make sure your account information is showing accurately.</li>
<li>Update important papers, such as a will, advanced directive, power of attorney, motor vehicle tile, etc.</li>
</ol>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2012/01/to-keep-or-change-last-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

