As a Portland Oregon divorce law firm, Stephens Margolin P.C. is dedicated to keeping up to date on Oregon Court of Appeals and Oregon Supreme Court opinions. As a service of The Oregon Divorce Blog, we will be providing updates as new opinions come out.
On July 15, 2009, the Court of Appeals ruled in the case of Shineovich and Kemp, in which the Petitioner challenged the constitutionality of tow statutes under which a married man is deemed to be the legal parent of children born to his wife.
Petitioner and Respondent were in a same sex relationship for 10 years, during which respondent became pregnant by artificial insemination. After they separated, Petitioner brought suit seeking a declaration that she was the legal parent. She alleged that Oregon Law created a privilege for married men as being the legal father of a child born to their wife, but not for same sex couples. The trial court dismissed the claim on legal grounds.
The parties had obtained a marriage license through Multnomah County prior to the child being born with the intent that the marriage would give Petitioner legal parentage. The marriage was subsequently declared void by operation of law. Respondent then became pregnant again, giving birth after the parties had separated. Respondent denied Petitioner contact with that child.
The court of appeals held that the statute which concerns artificial insemination, ORS 109.243, violates Article I, Section 20, of the Oregon constitution, and that its protections should be expanded to include legal parenthood by operation of law for the domestic partner of a woman who conceives a child by artificial insemination.
The entire opinion can be viewed here: http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A138013.htm
The lawyers at Stephens Margolin P.C. can assist you with your family law appellate questions. If you have any questions about Oregon appellate law please contact Daniel Margolin, who focuses part of his practice on family law appeals, or C. Sean Stephens at Stephens Margolin P.C.
Contact Us
Categories
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Annulment
- Appeal
- Attorney Fees
- Child Custody
- Child Support
- Collaborative Divorce
- Dissolution
- Divorce
- Divorce Tech
- Domestic Partners
- Domestic Violence
- Enforcement
- Grandparents
- International
- Legal Developments
- Legal Separation
- Modification
- Myths
- News
- Out of State
- Parenting Time / Visitation
- Prenuptial Agreements
- Property Division
- Settlement
- Spousal Support
- Statistics
- Top 10 List
Resources
- Applied Divorce Solutions
- Arizona Family Law Blog
- California Divorce Blog
- Clackamas County Circuit Court
- Collaborative Divorce Northwest Blog
- Darn Divorce
- Discussing the Law: The Online Edition
- Divorce Law Journal
- Family Law in Oregon
- Family Law Prof
- Florida Divorce & Family Law Blog
- Georgia Family Law
- International Family Law News
- J. Douglas Barics blog
- Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog
- LawGuru
- Los Angeles Divorce & Family Law
- Maine Divorce Law Blog
- Maryland Divorce Legal Crier
- MTV’s True Life
- Multnomah County Circuit Court
- Ohio Family Law Blog
- Oregon Court of Appeals Decisions
- Oregon Legal Research
- Oregon Revised Statutes
- Oregon State Bar
- Oregon Supreme Court Decisions
- Oregon Wills Trusts Probate Blog
- Portland Real Estate Blog
- Second Saturday – What Women Need to Know About Divorce
- South Carolina Family Law blog
- Stephens Margolin P.C.
- The Legal Reader
- The Modern Woman’s Divorce Guide
- Total Divorce Blog
- Wall Street Journal Law Blog
- Washington County Circuit Court
- Women’s Divorce Blog
- Yamhill County Circuit Court
It sounds like the Court of Appeals got this one right.