<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Case Law &#8211; Constructive Trust Over Life Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/04/new-case-law-constructive-trust-over-life-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/04/new-case-law-constructive-trust-over-life-insurance/</link>
	<description>Divorce and Family Law information from Stephens Margolin P.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Sean Stephens</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/04/new-case-law-constructive-trust-over-life-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-21636</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Sean Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=441#comment-21636</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah:

Generally it&#039;s a good idea to have life insurance to protect child support.  However, the order of life insurance to protect a support stream is discretionary, and if it wasn&#039;t specifically negotiated, and you have a complete mediated deal, you have a great argument to exclude it from the judgment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah:</p>
<p>Generally it&#8217;s a good idea to have life insurance to protect child support.  However, the order of life insurance to protect a support stream is discretionary, and if it wasn&#8217;t specifically negotiated, and you have a complete mediated deal, you have a great argument to exclude it from the judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah canchola</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/04/new-case-law-constructive-trust-over-life-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-21523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah canchola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 02:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=441#comment-21523</guid>
		<description>My divorce is almost complete. We have settled on everything and I am awaiting on paperwork from opposing side. My ex spouse texted me stating that her lawyer is finishing up the forms but needs info regarding my life insurance policy. This was not brought up in mediation and we have sworn on the settlement. Am I required to name her as beneficiary or to carry a policy for her? I am required to pay child support.  I do already have a policy through work. Thanks JC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My divorce is almost complete. We have settled on everything and I am awaiting on paperwork from opposing side. My ex spouse texted me stating that her lawyer is finishing up the forms but needs info regarding my life insurance policy. This was not brought up in mediation and we have sworn on the settlement. Am I required to name her as beneficiary or to carry a policy for her? I am required to pay child support.  I do already have a policy through work. Thanks JC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

