<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dispute Resolution: Family Law Mediation in Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/</link>
	<description>Divorce and Family Law information from Stephens Margolin P.C.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tulsa Divorce Attorney</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/comment-page-1/#comment-32336</link>
		<dc:creator>Tulsa Divorce Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=290#comment-32336</guid>
		<description>I am strongly in support of judge&#039;s ordering the spouses to complete one mediation session during the divorce, however collaborative divorce is a much more in depth process and is quickly proving to be more effective in creating long-term solutions than traditional mediation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am strongly in support of judge&#8217;s ordering the spouses to complete one mediation session during the divorce, however collaborative divorce is a much more in depth process and is quickly proving to be more effective in creating long-term solutions than traditional mediation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR</title>
		<link>http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2009/01/dispute-resolution-family-law-mediation-in-multnomah-washington-and-clackamas-counties/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>ELR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=290#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>I have a question about what the OR Family Law states is required from Parent A to give Parent B when financial records are asked for.  What would be an example of what is deemable, by law, as mandatory for release vs what is considered optional and therefore can be concealed if chosen?  (For example, phone bill vs loan invoice?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about what the OR Family Law states is required from Parent A to give Parent B when financial records are asked for.  What would be an example of what is deemable, by law, as mandatory for release vs what is considered optional and therefore can be concealed if chosen?  (For example, phone bill vs loan invoice?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

