Comments on: New Case Law: Court’s failure to specify parenting plan for father reversed http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/11/new-case-law-an-order-for-no-parenting-time/ Divorce and Family Law information from Stephens Margolin P.C. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Tulsa Divorce Attorney http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/11/new-case-law-an-order-for-no-parenting-time/comment-page-1/#comment-32343 Tulsa Divorce Attorney Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:16:30 +0000 http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=250#comment-32343 It sounds like the Court of Appeals made the right call on this one. It sounds like the Court of Appeals made the right call on this one.

]]> By: Tulsa Divorce Attorney http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/11/new-case-law-an-order-for-no-parenting-time/comment-page-1/#comment-32342 Tulsa Divorce Attorney Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:15:59 +0000 http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=250#comment-32342 It sounds like the Court of Appeals got this one right. It sounds like the Court of Appeals got this one right.

]]> By: A Father http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/11/new-case-law-an-order-for-no-parenting-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2292 A Father Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:04:07 +0000 http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=250#comment-2292 Great. I'm glad they have to give some time. But what if "SOME" is defined as something unreasonable. I would bet that "NO" parenting time is rare. I would be that "UNREASONABLE" parenting time is way to common. What's being done about this? Great. I’m glad they have to give some time.

But what if “SOME” is defined as something unreasonable.

I would bet that “NO” parenting time is rare.
I would be that “UNREASONABLE” parenting time is way to common.

What’s being done about this?

]]> By: LjK http://oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/2008/11/new-case-law-an-order-for-no-parenting-time/comment-page-1/#comment-1143 LjK Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:53:50 +0000 http://www.oregondivorceblog.com/wordpress/?p=250#comment-1143 test comment test comment

]]>